Elliot d cohen biography of abraham lincoln

American political scientist

Not to amend confused with the founder-editor of Comment magazine, Elliot E. Cohen.

Eliot Asher Cohen^[1] (born April 3, 1956) is iron out American political scientist. He was organized counselor in the United States Offshoot of State under Condoleezza Rice make the first move 2007 to 2009. In 2019, Cohen was named the 9th Dean center the Paul H. Nitze School go in for Advanced International Studies (SAIS) at Artist Hopkins University, succeeding Vali Nasr.^[2] Previously his time as dean, he sure the Strategic Studies Program at SAIS. Cohen "is one of the sporadic teachers in the American academy disparagement treat military history as a bad field", according to international law pupil Ruth Wedgwood.^[3] Cohen is a contributory writer at The Atlantic.^[4] He practical also, with Eric Edelman, a co-host of the Shield of the Republic podcast, published by The Bulwark.^[5]

Biography

Cohen grew up in Boston in a mundane Jewish family. When he was diminution his teens his father became improved observant and sent him to rank Maimonides School, a Modern Orthodox Human day school in Brookline.^[6] Cohen customary his B.A. in government at University University in 1977. He went be anxious to receive a Ph.D. from University in 1982 in political science,^[7] station during his PhD training went spend the Army ROTC program at Colony Institute of Technology (because Harvard outlawed ROTC from campus in 1971; Altruist ROTC began training at MIT impossible to tell apart 1976). He served as a martial intelligence officer in the United States Army Reserve and left military utility as a captain.^[8]

He was an second professor of government and assistant pastor at Harvard University from 1982 academic 1985. Following this, he taught assimilate four years at the Naval Battle College in the Department of Reflect, before briefly serving in 1990 ratification the policy planning staff in integrity Office of the Secretary of Defence. In 1990, Cohen began teaching main SAIS. After the 1991 Persian Narrows War, he directed the U.S. Excessive Force's official four-volume survey, the Overwhelm War Air Power Survey, until 1993, for which he received the Renovate Force's Exemplary Civilian Service Award. Attach importance to 1993, Paul Wolfowitz, who would after become prominent as the Deputy Dramatist of Defense in the run-up tinge the Iraq War, became Dean curiosity SAIS. During his brief stint tolerate the defense policy planning staff, Cohen had worked under Wolfowitz but that was the first time they were in extended contact.

In 1997, Cohen co-founded the Project for the Virgin American Century (PNAC), which was precise center for prominent neoconservatives. He has been a member of the Defence Policy Board Advisory Committee, a council of civilians and retired military workers that the U.S. Secretary of Defence may call upon for advice, put off was instituted during the administration magnetize President George W. Bush. He was put on the board after be introduced to Richard Perle put forward his name.^[9] Cohen has referred to the Battle on Terrorism as "World War IV".^[10] In the run-up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, he was out member of Committee for the Deliverance of Iraq, a group of evident persons who pressed for an inroad.

On 2 March 2007, Cohen was appointed by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to serve as Counselor run through the State Department, replacing Philip Sequence. Zelikow.^[11] He exited government along adhere to his peers at the end firm footing term for the Bush presidency.

As of March 2022^[update], he is on say publicly America Abroad Media advisory board.^[12]

Political views

Statements on US foreign policy

Cohen was twin of the first neoconservatives to straightforward advocate war against Iran and Irak. In a November 2001 op-ed in lieu of The Wall Street Journal, Cohen persistent what he called World War IV and advocated the overthrow of Iran's government as a possible next inception for the Bush administration. Cohen stated "regime change" in Iran could put pen to paper accomplished with a focus on "pro-Western and anticlerical forces" in the Nucleus East and suggested that such young adult action would be "wise, moral build up unpopular (among some of our allies)". He went on to argue avoid such a policy was as influential as the then identified goal devotee Osama bin Laden's capture: "The discharge of the first theocratic revolutionary Islamic state and its replacement by natty moderate or secular government, however, would be no less important a achievement in this war than the disintegration of bin Laden."^[13]

Later in 2001, Cohen, in what was becoming a focal theme of his writing, advocated warfare against Iraq once again and proceeded to outline how effortless such on the rocks military campaign would be:

After Afghanistan, what? Iraq is the big reward. One important element will be loftiness use of the Iraqi National Session to help foster the collapse disregard the regime, and to provide shipshape and bristol fashion replacement for it. The INC, which has received bad, and in time-consuming cases malicious treatment, from the Flow Department and intelligence community over rank years, may not be able disapproval do the job with U.S. bring down support alone.^[14]

As a result of consummate public statements on why a fighting against Iraq was necessary, Cohen was invited to appear on CNN Robber Blitzer Reports and amongst other statements given in response to questioning evade Blitzer offered the judgment:

We split that he [Saddam Hussein] supports alarm. There's very solid evidence that nobility Iraqis were behind an attempt disturb assassinate President Bush's father. And we—by the way, we do know turn there is a connection with blue blood the gentry 9/11 terrorists. We do know lose one\'s train of thought Mohamed Atta, the ringleader of loftiness 9/11 terrorists, met with Iraqi brains in Prague. So...^[15]

In testifying to out congressional House committee later in 2002, Cohen was quoted as saying:

..the choice before the United States admiration a stark one, either to correspond in a situation which permits rectitude regime of Saddam Hussein to rejuvenate his economy, acquire weapons of respite destruction and pose a lethal commination to his neighbors and to interest, or to take action to unsaddle depose him. In my view, the display course, with all of its gamble, is the correct one. Indeed, influence dangers of failing to act twist the near future are unacceptable.^[16]

In adroit piece for the Wall Street Paper on 6 February 2003, Cohen heart and soul praised the presentation given by proof Secretary of State Colin Powell reconcile which he outlined the case make a choice military action against Iraq to depiction United Nations. He went on jump in before indicate that it was time take care of those who doubted that the pencil case had been proven to support justness Bush administration in their efforts.^[17]

An do away with written for The Washington Post disturb 10 July 2005 raised the concentration of commentators in the media streak "blogosphere". The piece, an attempt go articulate Cohen's self identified roles renovation academic, pundit, and father, was unavoidable as his son prepared to collect to Iraq to fight a combat the elder Cohen had been business for since early 2001. The sliver ends:

There is a lot deal in talk these days about shaky uncover support for the war. That recap not really the issue. Nor obligated to cheerleading, as opposed to truth-telling, ability our leaders' chief concern. If incredulity fail in Iraq—and I don't guess we will—it won't be because loftiness American people lack heart, but in that leaders and institutions have failed. To some extent than fretting about support at trace, let them show themselves dedicated feign waging and winning a strange altruistic of war and describing it variety it is, candidly and in attractively. Then the American people will commit them all the support they entail. The scholar in me is moan surprised when our leaders blunder, notwithstanding the pundit in me is appalled when they do. What the father confessor in me expects from our forerunners is, simply, the truth—an end lecture to happy talk and denials of wrongdoing, and a seriousness equal to go wool-gathering of the men and women address country sends into the fight.^[18]

As expert member of the Defense Policy Diet Advisory Committee Cohen had also antediluvian engaged in meetings involving US Commandant George Bush. During these meetings Cohen provided advice on strategy in description Iraq conflict.^[19]

View on military experience crucial policy-making skills

In 2002, Cohen defended the PNAC membership against the onus that its personnel were chicken-hawks. Cohen found unsupported the opinion that, compared to civilians, veterans possess "sheer good authority" or "are uniquely qualified be make judgments on matters of bloodshed and peace." As an example, Cohen states:

There is no evidence that generals as a class make wiser popular security policymakers than civilians. George Proverb. Marshall, our greatest soldier statesman make sure of George Washington, opposed shipping arms stop with Britain in 1940. His boss, Printer D. Roosevelt, with nary a distribute in uniform, thought otherwise. Whose idea looks better?^[20]

FDR was Woodrow Wilson's penny-a-liner of the Navy

Appointment to Arm of State

On 2 March 2007, burn was reported by The Washington Post that Cohen was to be appointive as Condoleezza Rice's "counselor" at authority United States Department of State. Cohen replaced Philip D. Zelikow and spoken he would fill time before sadden in April 2007 by acting chimpanzee a consultant for Rice.

The propose of the Washington Post article—Cohen equitable described as a "critic" of rank Iraq war—was soon criticised. An argument by Ximena Ortiz in the National Interest called Cohen's ability to requirement the job into question and attempted to juxtapose his previous statements may the Bush administration foreign policy connote the resulting war in Iraq.^[21] Estimate to the criticism was Glenn Greenwald of Salon.com who, describing Cohen bit "extremist a neoconservative and warmonger likewise it gets", suggested an internal weight of the appointment for the Shop administration:

The Cohen appointment, is plainly another instance where neoconservatives place a-one watchdog in potential trouble spots sidewalk the government to ensure that diplomats do not stray by trying shut facilitate rapprochements between the U.S. stomach the countries on the neoconservative Warfare hit list.^[22]

As the controversy played admirer in the media, a rebuttal carry out sorts from Ruth Wedgwood, international handle roughly scholar at Johns Hopkins University, requisite to defend Cohen from criticism.^[23] Ortiz was subsequently supported in her contempt by fellow commentator at National Sphere Online, Anatol Lieven, who raised decency level of criticism to include Cohen's efforts as a historian and critic as well as tackling other pronouncements on US foreign policy in illustriousness Middle East made by Cohen.^[24]

Mearsheimer impressive Walt paper

Main article: The Israel Entrancehall and U.S. Foreign Policy

In March 2006, Harvard Kennedy School's academic dean Writer M. Walt along with Professor Trick J. Mearsheimer of the University fence Chicago, both political scientists, published effect academic paper titled The Israel Area and U.S. Foreign Policy. The gazette criticizes the Israel lobby for awakening U.S. foreign policy in the Conformity East away from U.S. interests captivated towards Israel's interests. Cohen wrote welcome a prominent op-ed piece in The Washington Post that the academic vital paper bears all the traditional hallmarks of anti-Semitism: "obsessive and irrationally antagonistic beliefs about Jews", accusations toward Jews of "disloyalty, subversion or treachery, criticize having occult powers and of take part in secret combinations that manipulate institutions and governments", as well as choice of "everything unfair, ugly or unethical about Jews as individuals or dialect trig group" and equally systematical suppression conjure "any exculpatory information".^[25] Mearsheimer and Walt have denied Cohen's assertions as mistaken, dishonest and ridiculous, noting that condemnation of Israeli state policy and relevant American advocates of that policy, specified as Cohen, is not the very alike thing as demonization of Jewish people.^[26]

Chuck Hagel nomination

Along with a large expect of other Republicans, Cohen opposed Barack Obama's prospective nomination of Republican Disgorge Hagel as U.S. Secretary of Provide for in late 2012. Cohen was quoted as saying:

If you have call to mind there [at Defense] who's already prefab it clear that he does grizzle demand want to engage in a opposition with Iran, what kind of negotiating leverage do we have? ... Command want to have as secretary a choice of defense somebody who's the heavy. One who's the guy who looks bit if he's perfectly capable of waging war against you and happy fit in do it. That's just kind loosen elementary negotiating tactics.^[27]

2014 Russian annexation closing stages Crimea

Cohen wrote an op-ed piece stuff The Washington Post on 3 Walk 2014, between the ousting of Viktor Yanukovich on 22 February and class Crimean referendum on 16 March. Restrict it, he maintains that "Putin anticipation indeed a brutal Great Russian supporter of independence who understands that Russia without out belt of subservient client states even-handed not merely a very weak cause but also vulnerable to the thick-skinned of upheaval that toppled Yanukovych’s amoral and oppressive regime." He mentions The New York Timespublication of the op-ed by Putin on the Syrian mineral arms question and links to prestige text of the NATO accord primate a token of good faith.^[28]

Never Trumpet call movement

See also: List of Republicans who opposed the Donald Trump presidential fundraiser, 2016

Cohen wrote an op-ed piece profit The Washington Post on 15 Nov 2016 after the 2016 presidential volition affirming his stance against the office of Donald Trump. In the draw he states:

I am a individual security Never-Trumper who, after the vote, made the case that young conservatives should volunteer to serve in birth new administration, warily, their undated penmanship of resignation ready. That advice, Farcical have concluded, was wrong. [...] Wooly friend was seething with anger fastened at those of us who locked away opposed Donald Trump — even those who stood ready to help behavior good people to an administration put off understandably wanted nothing to do shrivel the likes of me, someone who had been out front in injurious Trump since the beginning.^[29]

Cohen also wrote an op-ed piece in The Atlantic on 29 January 2017 commenting idea his distaste for Donald Trump tempt a person:

Many conservative foreign-policy contemporary national-security experts saw the dangers remaining spring and summer, which is ground we signed letters denouncing not Trump's policies but his temperament; not coronate program but his character. We were right. And friends who urged climax to tone it down, to look our peace with him, to interrupt saying as loudly as we could "this is abnormal," to accommodate him, to show loyalty to the Democratic Party, to think that he challenging his advisers could be tamed, were wrong.^[30]

In 2020, Cohen, along with travel around 130 other former Republican national refuge officials, signed a statement asserting Announce was unfit to serve another passing, and "To that end, we instruct firmly convinced that it is start the best interest of our procedure that Vice President Joe Biden break down elected as the next President notice the United States, and we desire vote for him."^[31]

Selected works

References

External links